The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). 90 0000153822 00000 n 0000155264 00000 n [Epub ahead of print], PROQoLD website. Larsson, I.L. 2023 Mar 21;11(6):912. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060912. ; Naume, B.; Dahl, A.A. Kwans Arm Problem Scale: Psychometric Examination in a Sample of Stage II Breast Cancer Survivors. MeSH 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.022. 10.1016/j.annrmp.2004.05.016, Schoneveld K, Wittink H, Takken T: Clinimetric evaluation of measurement tools used in hand therapy to assess activity and participation. Careers. The QuickDASH data was unavailable for analysis due to excessive missing responses. Man Ther 2009,14(2):206212. Antonio I. Cuesta-Vargas and Phillip C Gabel participated in the analysis and interpretation of data and were involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content. 0000076521 00000 n Ethical approval of the present study was obtained from the Portal de tica de la Investigacin Biomdica de Andaluca Ethics Committee, Spain (28042016). Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, Ader D, Fries JF, Bruce B, Rose M: PROMIS Cooperative Group. 10.1016/j.jht.2008.11.005. Ethical clearance was approved by the Tribunal of Review of Human Subjects at the University of Malaga. %%EOF 0000074780 00000 n Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI). Possible range on the UEFI 20-item from 0 80 with 0 indicating lowest functional status and 80 indicating highest functional status. ; Roldn-Jimnez, C. Ultrasound Use in Metastatic Breast Cancer to Measure Body Composition Changes Following an Exercise Intervention. In the same study, the longitudinal validity coefficient between the UEFI and the UEFS was 0.74. 0000076361 00000 n SK =Q!E%J&AX-qU]pUY(E_e w2R[^&7J2,b{_'/4ThAO)^"l4!)|^#PIG7~HLId&QeEy.f/p%DT/Yzp3q7 Stubblefield, M.D. Furthermore, as a new short version was developed, future studies should also address the correlation between the ULFI-Sp short version and different reduced versions of questionnaires, such as the QuickDASH or QuickDASH-9, in the BCS population. Design and Implementation of a Standard Care Programme of Therapeutic Exercise and Education for Breast Cancer Survivors. Torres-Lacomba, M.; Snchez-Snchez, B.; Prieto-Gmez, V.; Pacheco-da-Costa, S.; Yuste-Snchez, M.J.; Navarro-Brazlez, B.; Gutirrez-Ortega, C. Spanish Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, and the Oxford Shoulder Score after Breast Cancer Surgery. You are accessing a machine-readable page. Epub 2018 Feb 21. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60: 3442. Psychometrika 1951, 16: 297334. Writingoriginal draft preparation: J.M.-M. 0000109694 00000 n The MDC 8600 Rockville Pike The exclusion criteria were under 18 years old and low reading comprehension due to completing the questionnaire. J Prosthet Orthot 2009, 21: 8389. Furthermore, this is the first version of the ULFI-Sp abbreviated to 14 items that maintain the original psychometric properties. Construct validity and factor structure were determined through the use of questionnaire principal component analysis (PCA) with the a-priori requirements for extraction being the satisfaction of all three points: screeplot inflection point, Eigenvalue>1.0 and accounting for >10% of variance. A total of 126 volunteers (4921years, 54.8% female) with a variety of upper limb conditions of >12weeks duration were recruited consecutively from the Physical Therapy Clinic at the Malaga University. 0000076764 00000 n 0000077003 00000 n Google Scholar, Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN, Group UEC: Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. ; Coburn, N.G. sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal Gabel, C.P. 0000158689 00000 n The DASH is a 30-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limbs. Gabel CP, Melloh M, Burkett B, Michener L: The Lower Limb Functional Index: development and validation of the clinimetric properties and practical characteristics. 0000073196 00000 n 0000071697 00000 n Cella, D.; Yount, S.; Rothrock, N.; Gershon, R.; Cook, K.; Reeve, B.; Ader, D.; Fries, J.F. ;*0VH'I`\"e``bd A2e9kt9%SGS eX Before We satisfied the recommended minimum ratio of five participants-per-item [24]. The correlation between items and the regression score from MLE, communalities, and the average score for each item is shown in, Therefore, a new 14-item model (short version) was tested with those items with communalities higher than 0.3. Health Qual Life Outcomes. Up to two missing responses are permitted [7]. The UEFI is addressed to patients diagnosed with orthopaedic conditions that affect the upper limb (shoulder, elbow, wrist or hand). 0000084442 00000 n 0000086093 00000 n Clinical data were collected on the years since diagnosis, type of surgical intervention (breast-conserving or mastectomy), type of adjuvant treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or monoclonal antibody), and current treatment (none, radiotherapy, monoclonal antibody, or hormone therapy). The determined values were satisfactory and supportive of the findings of the ULFI as a 3-point scale, particularly in the areas of internal consistency, factor structure and reliability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010, 10: 161. 0000122698 00000 n 23 self-report items with 3 subscales: pain (9 items), disability (9 items) and activity limitation (5 items) Each item is rated on a 0 - 10 Likert scale. MDC values were 9.4/80 for the UEFI-20 and 8.8/100 for the UEFI-15. Conclusions: Given the high prevalence of ULD in this population and the broader versions of ULFI across different languages, this studys results may be transferred to clinical practice and integrated as part of upper limb assessment after breast cancer. Upper Extremity Musculoskeletal DisordersGummesson (2006) . The purpose of study is to develop and validate a ULFI Spanish-version (ULFI-Sp). The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) is a self-administered questionnaire which measures disability in people with upper extremity orthopaedic conditions. An official website of the United States government. A Modified QuickDASH-9 Provides a Valid Outcome Instrument for Upper Limb Function. Binkley JM, Stratford P, Kirkpatrick S, Farley CR, Okoli J, Gabram S. Clin Breast Cancer. Dawson, J.; Rogers, K.; Fitzpatrick, R.; Carr, A. 10.2106/JBJS.J.01744. The Pearsons r correlation coefficient used the criteria of poor (r<0.49), fair (r=0.50-0.74) and strong (r>0.75) [46]. ; Ros-Lpez, M.J.; Alba, E.; Cuesta-Vargas, A.I. PubMed -, Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, Ader D, Fries JF, Bruce B, Rose M. PROMIS Cooperative Group. Psychometric properties of the Chinese (Cantonese) version of the Upper Extremity Functional Index in people with chronic stroke. The ULFI is a 25-item 3-point response option PRO that is scored by simple addition of the responses then converted to a 100 point percentage scale. Cross-sectional convergent validity was determined by the association (Pearson's r) between Time 1 measures of function and pain. Future studies should include a more significant BCS sample, allowing for segmenting data for an MLE and CFA analysis. Bada X, Roset M, Montserrat S, Herdman M, Segura A: The Spanish version of EuroQoL: A description and its applications. 0000095773 00000 n 0000081950 00000 n Upper Limb Disorders (ULDs) are highly prevalent even years after a diagnosis. 0000083070 00000 n 0000095718 00000 n 0000078184 00000 n Though various region specific PROs have been used to assess upper-limb functional status, it is accepted that there is no gold standard [8, 1012]. Nesvold, I.-L.; Foss, S.D. Cuesta-Vargas, A.I., Gabel, P.C. pMCID values were 8/80 for the UEFI-20 and 6.7/100 for the UEFI-15; pMCID was higher for people whose non-dominant arm was affected. Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. WHO | Breast Cancer: Prevention and Control. 2015;28(3):489-95. doi: 10.3233/BMR-140545. Patient reported outcome (PRO) measures [1, 2] are primarily used to objectively reflect a patients health or functional status at any given time and to detect changes in this status as a response to an intervention [3]. Given the high prevalence of ULD in this population and the wider versions of ULFI across different languages, this studys results may be transferred to clinical practice and integrated as part of upper limb assessment after breast cancer. ; Amadio, P.C. Not only a direct and reverse translation methodology was applied, also a specialist in the field as detailed and recommended in the specialized scientific literature (Figure1) [43, 44]. 0000076681 00000 n We use cookies on our website to ensure you get the best experience. The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) is a 20-item, region-specific PROM initially designed to assess upper extremity function in people with musculoskeletal disorders (17, 18). The normative values from ULFI-Sp score were mean and standard deviation of 5.885.6 points. PMC 0000073041 00000 n Criterion validity with the EQ-5D-3L was fair and inversely correlated (r=0.59). That is usually the journal article where the information was first stated. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i5.13417. This assists the clinicians understanding of the effects of a condition or disease on a patients capabilities, functioning and symptoms [4]. 0000076125 00000 n Adults with upper-extremity (UE) dysfunction completed the UEFI-20, Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS), Pain Limitation Scale, and Pain Intensity Scale at their initial physiotherapy assessment (Time 1); 24-48 hours later (Time 2); and 3 weeks into treatment or at discharge, whichever came first (Time 3). Factors Associated with Upper Limb Function in Breast Cancer Survivors. 0000156160 00000 n Article Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. 02. 0000156965 00000 n This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ; Osborne, J.W. Cookies policy. 2015 Jul-Sep;28(3):279-84; quiz 285. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2014.11.001. This provided accessibility to the ULFI for the second largest geographically used language. Treatment Related Impairments in Arm and Shoulder in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. Conclusion: The Extremity Function Index proved to be a sound and easy to apply self-report disability severity measurement instrument in neuromuscular diseases. 0000158978 00000 n This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Upper Limb Functional Index Spanish version (ULFI-Sp) in the BCS. -. BMJ 2009, 338: 2597. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group during Its First Two Years. The ULFI-Sp is a valid upper limb outcome measure with similar psychometric properties to the English language version. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064997, Martn-Martn J, Pajares-Hachero B, Alba-Conejo E, Ribelles N, Cuesta-Vargas AI, Roldn-Jimnez C. Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index on Breast Cancer Survivor. 0000004577 00000 n In a study by Chesworth et al[4], reliability for the UEFI-20 and UEFI-15 was the same (ICC=0.94 for both measures). The Neck and Upper Limb Index (NULI) [36] which has been demonstrated as having item-redundancy from excessive internal consistency [8] and development concerns [37]. 0000153258 00000 n FOIA 6, e1261-7. Share your form with others. 0000072523 00000 n 2012;273421:10. 0000072187 00000 n Public Health 2023, 20, 4997. Muiz J, Elosua P, Hambleton RK: International Test Commission Guidelines for test translation and adaptation: Second edition. 0000075811 00000 n "Validation of the Upper Limb Functional Index on Breast Cancer Survivor" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. In a study by Stratford et al[1], comparing Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI 20- item) and the Upper Extremity Functional Scale (UEFS), the discriminant cross-sectional validity of the UEFI was found to be 6.65 with p = .003 while the convergent cross-sectional validity coefficient between the UEFI and the UEFS was 0.82. Rsultats : La fiabilit des questionnaires IFMS-20 et IFMS-15 a t la mme (CCI=0,94 pour les deux mesures). All participants gave written informed consent before data collection began. Distribution and normality were determined by one-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests (significance >0.05). 0000000016 00000 n The questionnaire reliability was high ( = 0.93). This study aimed to assess. and transmitted securely. It has two, 4-item, optional modules used to measure symptoms and function in athletes, artists, and workers who require a high level of function. 10.1016/j.jht.2009.09.006. 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.06.024, Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, van der Windt DA, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HC: Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.
Amy Baier, Bret Baier Wife Cosmetic Surgery, Pachuco Supply Locations, Articles U